Services/Section 24

Section 24 Mitigation

Section 24 replaced your mortgage interest deduction with a flat 20% tax credit in 2020. For higher-rate Harrow landlords with leveraged portfolios, the annual cost now runs to £3,000–£9,000 per property. We match you with a specialist who calculates your exact exposure and chooses between the three mitigation routes that actually work.

The argument

Why a specialist matters here

Most Section 24 advice defaults to 'incorporate your portfolio'. That is sometimes right and frequently wrong — SDLT on transfer, CGT on disposal, and the extraction cost of getting money back out can destroy the headline tax saving. A proper specialist models all three mitigation routes against your actual numbers before recommending one.

What goes wrong

The three problems a general accountant won't catch

01

You pay tax on revenue, not profit

Section 24 taxes your full rental income before mortgage interest. If your gross rent is £24,000 and your mortgage interest is £14,000, HMRC still taxes you as if you made £24,000 — then gives back a 20% credit. Higher-rate landlords end up paying income tax on money that went straight to the lender.

02

The damage is cumulative

Section 24 phased in between 2017 and 2020 and has been at 100% since. Each year you stay in personal name at higher rate, the arithmetic gets worse — especially as interest rates rise and the credit stays flat at 20%.

03

The wrong fix is worse than no fix

Incorporating without modelling the SDLT surcharge, CGT on transfer, and extraction costs is the single most expensive mistake Harrow landlords make. The break-even is usually 5–10 years and depends entirely on your specific portfolio.

What you get

What the specialist delivers

01

Exact exposure calculation

Not an estimate. Your actual Section 24 cost this tax year and projected across the next five, based on your real rents, mortgages, and marginal rate.

02

Three-route comparison

Income restructuring, phased SPV incorporation, and portfolio restructuring — modelled side by side against the status quo. You see the numbers, not a sales pitch.

03

Implementation roadmap

If incorporation wins, the specialist plans the transfer sequence, SDLT management, and CGT deferral strategy. If income restructuring wins, spousal transfers and timing are drafted.

04

Ongoing filing & monitoring

Annual self-assessment that correctly handles the mortgage interest credit, plus quarterly check-ins as rates and rules change.

Common questions

FAQs on section 24

How much is Section 24 actually costing me?

For a Harrow higher-rate landlord with a £400k buy-to-let mortgaged at 75% LTV, typical Section 24 cost is £3,200–£5,400 a year per property. Across a 4-property portfolio that is £12k–£22k annually — money you pay HMRC on income that never reached you.

Should I incorporate my portfolio?

Only after the numbers are modelled. Incorporation triggers SDLT at 3%+ on every property transferred, potential CGT on the uplift, and ongoing corporation tax plus extraction cost when you draw dividends. The break-even is typically 5–10 years; below that you lose money by incorporating. A proper model tells you which side you're on.

Is there a way to mitigate Section 24 without incorporating?

Yes, in specific circumstances. If one spouse is a basic-rate taxpayer, shifting beneficial ownership reallocates income. If you have unused personal allowance, rebalancing can help. For larger portfolios, a hybrid structure (some personal, some company) often beats full incorporation.

Does Section 24 apply to all landlords?

No. It only applies to residential buy-to-let held in personal names by individuals or partnerships. Furnished holiday lets used to be exempt but this was removed from April 2025. Companies, LLPs, and commercial property are outside the scope. This is why incorporation is often proposed — it steps outside the rule entirely.

Ready to see who we'd match you with for section 24?