Services/Section 24 & BTL planning
Section 24 Specialism

Section 24 & BTL Tax Planning

Section 24 mortgage interest restriction is the biggest single change to BTL taxation in a decade. For higher-rate landlords with substantial finance costs, the personal-name holding model is materially worse than incorporation in many portfolios. Specialist accountants model your Section 24 exposure exactly, assess whether incorporation into a SPV is justified at portfolio scale, and advise on the structural choices (Form 17, partnership, joint ownership) that move the after-tax position.

What this covers

What Section 24 & BTL Planning Actually Involves

Since April 2020, individual landlords can no longer deduct mortgage interest from rental income. Instead, finance costs receive a 20% basic-rate tax credit. For higher-rate (40%) and additional-rate (45%) landlords with substantial finance costs, this can mean materially more tax than the rental cash flow suggests — sometimes 60%+ effective rate on the rental income after allowing for the credit. Specialist accountants model the Section 24 effect explicitly each year and advise on incorporation timing where the after-tax position justifies it.

The Section 24 calculation: total rental profit (rental income minus allowable expenses, where expenses now exclude mortgage interest) is taxed at your marginal rate. Then a 20% basic-rate tax credit on finance costs is given against the SA tax bill. Specialist accountants get the calculation right and identify carry-forward credits where finance costs exceed available tax in a year (the unused credit carries forward indefinitely, but generalist accountants frequently miss the carry-forward across years and lose the relief).

The Section 24 restriction applies to mortgage interest specifically — not to all finance costs. Arrangement fees, broker fees, valuation fees, product-switch fees, and other ancillary finance costs remain fully deductible as revenue expenses. Generalist accountants frequently apply the 20% restriction to all finance costs (overstating tax); specialist accountants split the components correctly.

Incorporation into a SPV is the standard response for higher-rate-tax landlords with substantial finance costs and 5+ year hold horizons. Inside a limited company, mortgage interest is fully deductible from corporation tax (no Section 24 restriction). The breakeven calculation involves SDLT cost on incorporation (typically £80-130k on a £1.5m portfolio), CGT on personal-side disposal, ongoing corporation tax at 19-25% + dividend tax versus personal income tax with Section 24. Specialist Harrow accountants model this each year for clients above the higher-rate threshold; generalist accountants frequently default to "incorporate" without modelling the SDLT properly.

Form 17 declaration to split BTL income unequally between spouses is a powerful pre-incorporation lever. Married couples and civil partners default to a 50/50 income split for tax purposes regardless of legal beneficial ownership, unless Form 17 is filed declaring an unequal split that matches the legal beneficial ownership exactly. Restructuring to a 70/30 or 80/20 split toward a basic-rate-tax spouse can save £3-8k/year of tax with a one-off legal cost (Deed of Trust + Form 17 filing) of ~£500-£800. Specialist accountants identify Form 17 opportunities; generalists frequently leave the 50/50 default in place even where a split would save material tax.

Edge cases

Where Section 24 & BTL Planning Catches Landlords Out

Pre-letting refurbishment confused with revenue — costs incurred before the first tenant moves in are NOT current-year revenue expenses. Pre-letting refurb is capital, added to the property base cost for eventual CGT. Generalist accountants frequently treat pre-letting refurb as immediate revenue, which is wrong and creates HMRC enquiry exposure on review.

Capital expenditure split — improvements creating a new asset or upgrading beyond original specification are capital (added to base cost), not current-year revenue. Like-for-like replacements are revenue. The boundary catches landlords out: a like-for-like boiler replacement is revenue, an upgrade to a higher-spec system is capital. Specialist accountants apply the test correctly; generalists default to expensing everything (the easier short-term answer that creates long-term exposure).

Replacement of domestic items relief — replaces wear-and-tear allowance from 2016. Allows deduction for replacing furniture, appliances, kitchenware (but NOT initial purchase, NOT improvements). Like-for-like replacement is fully revenue; an upgrade to better-spec items is partial revenue (the like-for-like portion only) plus capital (the upgrade portion).

Furnished holiday letting (FHL) — properties meeting specific criteria (UK-located, fully furnished, available 210+ days, actually let 105+ days, no single letting exceeding 31 days for at least 7 months) qualify for FHL treatment with materially better tax rules: full mortgage interest deduction (no Section 24), capital allowances available, business asset disposal relief on sale. The FHL regime is being phased out from April 2025 — specialist accountants navigate the transition planning for current FHL operators.

Section 24 carry-forward losses — finance costs that exceed the 20% credit available in a year (because there's insufficient tax liability to absorb the credit) carry forward indefinitely against future credits. The carry-forward calculation is multi-year and frequently miscalculated by generalists who don't track it across years.

Joint ownership between unrelated parties versus spouses — partnership tax rules apply to joint ownership between unrelated parties, with income split per the partnership agreement. Spouse joint ownership defaults to 50/50 unless Form 17 declares otherwise. The two regimes are different and shouldn't be conflated.

How it plays out

How Section 24 Planning Plays Out

01

Section 24 calculation rebuild for higher-rate landlord

Higher-rate-tax Harrow landlord with 3 BTL properties had been calculating Section 24 incorrectly — applying the restriction to all finance costs (£8,400/year of arrangement fees, broker fees, valuation fees, plus £21,200 of mortgage interest). Correct treatment: Section 24 applies to the £21,200 of mortgage interest only; the £8,400 of other finance costs is fully deductible. Recalculated 3 years of returns; net tax recovery £2,600 across the period plus a clean baseline going forward. Set up the carry-forward tracker so unused 20% credit isn't lost in years where rental profit is insufficient.

02

Form 17 restructure, married couple BTL portfolio

Married couple holding 4-property BTL portfolio with one spouse on additional rate (45% bracket) and the other a basic-rate-only earner. Default 50/50 income split was costing ~£5,800/year extra tax versus an 80/20 split with the basic-rate spouse holding the larger share. Restructured legal beneficial ownership to 80/20 via Deed of Trust, filed Form 17 declaration with HMRC, applied the 80/20 split going forward. Annual saving ~£5,800; one-off legal cost £680 amortised over 1.5 months.

03

SPV incorporation modelling, 5-property Harrow landlord

Higher-rate-tax landlord with 5 BTL properties (mix of HMO and standard BTL) generating £180k gross rents and ~£68k mortgage interest. Section 24 in personal hands cost ~£11k/year of additional tax versus pre-2017 full-deduction treatment. Modelled SPV incorporation: SDLT on the £1.85m portfolio (after Multiple Dwellings Relief) ~£82k, CGT on personal-side disposal ~£28k, ongoing corporation tax savings vs personal income tax ~£18k/year. Net of one-off costs, breakeven at year 6.5 with cumulative savings thereafter. Recommended phased incorporation aligned with refinance windows; modelled the year-by-year position to validate the call.

Common questions

FAQs on section 24 & btl planning

How does Section 24 affect me as a higher-rate-tax landlord?

Since April 2020, you can no longer deduct mortgage interest from rental income; instead, finance costs receive a 20% basic-rate tax credit. For higher-rate (40%) or additional-rate (45%) landlords with substantial finance costs, this can mean materially more tax than the rental cash flow suggests. The restriction applies to mortgage interest specifically — arrangement fees, broker fees, valuation fees, and product-switch fees remain fully deductible.

When does Section 24 make incorporation worthwhile?

For higher-rate-tax landlords with 4+ properties, 70%+ LTV, and 5+ year hold horizons, incorporation typically wins on after-tax yield. For single-property or low-leverage landlords, personal holding usually wins on simplicity. The breakeven calculation involves SDLT on incorporation (typically £80-130k on a £1.5m portfolio), CGT on personal-side disposal, ongoing corporation tax + dividend tax versus personal income tax with Section 24. Specialist accountants model this each year.

Can I use Form 17 to split BTL income with my spouse unequally?

Yes — married couples and civil partners default to 50/50 income split unless you file Form 17 declaring an unequal split that matches the legal beneficial ownership exactly. Where one spouse is in a lower tax bracket, restructuring to a 70/30, 80/20, or 90/10 split with a corresponding Deed of Trust and Form 17 can save material tax. The legal restructuring is a one-off cost; the tax saving compounds annually.

What's the difference between revenue and capital expenditure for my BTL?

Revenue (deductible against rental income in the year): repairs, maintenance, replacement of like-for-like items, restoration to original condition. Capital (added to property base cost for CGT, not current-year deductible): improvements creating a new asset or upgrading beyond the original specification. The boundary catches landlords out — a like-for-like boiler replacement is revenue, an upgrade is capital. Specialist accountants apply the test correctly using HMRC's case-law-informed guidance.

Do I have to apply Section 24 to all my finance costs?

No — Section 24 applies to mortgage interest specifically. Arrangement fees, broker fees, valuation fees, and product-switch fees remain fully deductible as revenue expenses. Generalist accountants frequently apply the 20% restriction to all finance costs (overstating tax); specialist accountants split the components correctly.

What happens if my Section 24 credit can't be used in a year?

The unused credit carries forward indefinitely against future credits. There's no time limit on the carry-forward (unlike trading losses with their 2-year limit). The carry-forward calculation is multi-year; specialist accountants track it across years and apply it correctly when next year's SA is prepared. Generalist accountants frequently miss the carry-forward, costing the landlord material tax.

Are furnished holiday lets affected by Section 24?

No — FHL properties are exempt from Section 24 (full mortgage interest deduction allowed) and qualify for capital allowances and business asset disposal relief on sale. The FHL regime is being phased out from April 2025, after which previously-FHL properties will fall back into standard BTL treatment with Section 24. Specialist accountants navigate the transition planning for current FHL operators.

Can I avoid Section 24 by holding through a partnership?

Partnerships of individuals are subject to Section 24 the same way as single-owner BTL. Limited partnerships with corporate partners, LLPs with corporate members, and SPVs (limited companies) are NOT subject to Section 24. The structural choice that avoids Section 24 has to involve a corporate entity holding the property (or its income); just structuring as a partnership of individuals doesn't help.

Ready to see who we'd match you with for section 24 & btl planning?